From d3496b12310d9fec0e52e537c341e87fcaa2f8b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Penz Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:21:58 +0100 Subject: Coding style update for pointer comparison Most developers seem to prefer if (ptr) ... if (!ptr) ... in comparison to if (ptr != 0) ... if (ptr == 0) ... Adjusted the Dolphin-code to use the "most-prefered style" to make contributors happy. --- src/dolphinviewcontainer.cpp | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/dolphinviewcontainer.cpp') diff --git a/src/dolphinviewcontainer.cpp b/src/dolphinviewcontainer.cpp index af333ba4f..0ecdaf685 100644 --- a/src/dolphinviewcontainer.cpp +++ b/src/dolphinviewcontainer.cpp @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ void DolphinViewContainer::setUrl(const KUrl& newUrl) void DolphinViewContainer::setFilterBarVisible(bool visible) { - Q_ASSERT(m_filterBar != 0); + Q_ASSERT(m_filterBar); if (visible) { m_filterBar->show(); m_filterBar->setFocus(); @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ void DolphinViewContainer::slotFinishedPathLoading() m_statusBar->setProgress(100); } - if (isSearchUrl(url()) && (m_view->items().count() == 0)) { + if (isSearchUrl(url()) && m_view->items().isEmpty()) { // The dir lister has been completed on a Nepomuk-URI and no items have been found. Instead // of showing the default status bar information ("0 items") a more helpful information is given: m_statusBar->setMessage(i18nc("@info:status", "No items found."), DolphinStatusBar::Information); -- cgit v1.3