From d3496b12310d9fec0e52e537c341e87fcaa2f8b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Penz Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:21:58 +0100 Subject: Coding style update for pointer comparison Most developers seem to prefer if (ptr) ... if (!ptr) ... in comparison to if (ptr != 0) ... if (ptr == 0) ... Adjusted the Dolphin-code to use the "most-prefered style" to make contributors happy. --- src/panels/information/informationpanel.cpp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/panels/information/informationpanel.cpp') diff --git a/src/panels/information/informationpanel.cpp b/src/panels/information/informationpanel.cpp index f1530c72c..9bfb711c6 100644 --- a/src/panels/information/informationpanel.cpp +++ b/src/panels/information/informationpanel.cpp @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void InformationPanel::setSelection(const KFileItemList& selection) return; } - if ((selection.count() == 0) && (m_selection.count() == 0)) { + if (selection.isEmpty() && m_selection.isEmpty()) { // The selection has not really changed, only the current index. // QItemSelectionModel emits a signal in this case and it is less // expensive doing the check this way instead of patching -- cgit v1.3