From d3496b12310d9fec0e52e537c341e87fcaa2f8b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Penz <peter.penz19@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:21:58 +0100
Subject: Coding style update for pointer comparison

Most developers seem to prefer
  if (ptr) ...
  if (!ptr) ...
in comparison to
  if (ptr != 0) ...
  if (ptr == 0) ...

Adjusted the Dolphin-code to use the "most-prefered style" to make contributors happy.
---
 src/tests/dolphinviewtest_allviewmodes.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'src/tests')

diff --git a/src/tests/dolphinviewtest_allviewmodes.cpp b/src/tests/dolphinviewtest_allviewmodes.cpp
index 743ce9fd4..8d7a5bd0d 100644
--- a/src/tests/dolphinviewtest_allviewmodes.cpp
+++ b/src/tests/dolphinviewtest_allviewmodes.cpp
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@ void DolphinViewTest_AllViewModes::verifySelectedItemsCount(int itemsCount) cons
     QCOMPARE(m_view->selectedItemsCount(), itemsCount);
     QCOMPARE(spySelectionChanged.count(), 1);
     QCOMPARE(qvariant_cast<KFileItemList>(spySelectionChanged.at(0).at(0)).count(), itemsCount);
-    if (itemsCount != 0) {
+    if (itemsCount) {
         QVERIFY(m_view->hasSelection());
     }
     else {
-- 
cgit v1.3